Monday, May 11, 2015

A Draft Proposal to Create a Seamless System of Parks in Washington, D.C. April 4, 2003

A Draft Proposal to Create a Seamless System of Parks in Washington, D.C. 

April 4, 2003

On March 4, 2003 Terry Carlstrom, Glenn Eugster, and Patrick Gregerson of NPS met with Neil Allen of the District, Steve Coleman of Washington Parks & People and Destry Jarvis of Outdoor Recreation & Park Services, to discuss current and future collaboration between the District and the NPS for the planning, management and use of City and National parks within the District.  Following the meeting, additional discussions were held, with input from Michael Lucy of the District, to further develop this draft proposal.

The goals of the proposed partnership include:

  • Improve efficiency and quality of management of our operations.
  • Improve quality of services to the residents/ visitors.
  • Improve communication.
  • Demonstrate the seamless system approach to parks, open space and recreation areas.

The proposed priority tasks proposed for future collaboration include:

  1. Make Watts Branch a “Seamless Park System Demonstration Project” 

The project would be a partnership between DC, NPS and Washington Parks & People.  It’s purpose is to demonstrate ways to erase park boundary-lines in order to improve park and recreation management and engage community leaders and residents in restoration, maintenance, volunteerism, friends-raising, fundraising, and stewardship.

  1. Apply to joint presentation at the National Partnership Conference in Los Angeles, CA in November 2003.

The presentation would feature a panel on Watts Branch, Casey Trees, Geographic Information Systems, the Greater Washington National Parks Fund, and other park, open space and recreation area efforts within the District of Columbia at the National Partnership Conference.

  1. Regularly exchange information, reports and studies.
Agree to routinely share various reports, studies and other information between NPS, the District and Washington Parks & People. 

4.  Use Geographic Information System (GIS) information to assess opportunities for collaboration.

Use existing NPS and DC GIS information to overlay DC and NPS parks to identify and assess opportunities to collaborate.

  1. Discuss Casey Trees inventory.

Discuss current and future tree inventory, maintenance and planting efforts. 


  1. Communicate regularly with each other and the DC community.
Hold periodic “ Washington, D.C. Park Forum”, brown-bag 
lunch meetings, to share relevant information, discuss issues and opportunities, and discuss the status of this effort. 

Jointly work together on periodic events to build

awareness of park resources and programs, and engage a broad cross section of the community, and outside volunteers, in park activities.

District of Columbia, Parks & Recreation—National Park Service, National Capital Region DRAFT Meeting Summary July 10, 2003

District of Columbia, Parks & Recreation—National Park Service, National Capital Region DRAFT Meeting Summary
July 10, 2003
Prepared by Glenn Eugster, NPS-NCR 7/29/03

Attendees:  NPS: Davis, Carlstrom, Blumenthal, Syphax, Hazelwood, Parsons (part), Gregerson, Eugster; DC: Albert, Lucy, Pochter, Shinn; Other: Steve Coleman, Washington Parks & People, Jarvis, Outdoor Recreation & Park Services, Inc.; Carl Cole, many affiliations.

Summary

The meeting began with brief remarks from Terry Carlstrom and Glenn Eugster of NPS. Mr. Eugster explained the origin of this collaboration and briefly described the meeting agenda.

Maps: The group reviewed a Geographic Information System map that was prepared by Tammy Stidham of NPS and discussed it.

Joint Ventures Conference: Destry Jarvis noted that he, and others, had been selected to present a panel on “The Future of Parks & Recreation” at the November 2003 Joint Ventures Conference in Los Angeles, CA.  He indicated that a State and City Park Director and a social scientist will join him on the panel.

Glenn Eugster confirmed that a panel that was suggested by DC, NPS, and Washington Parks & People on “Washington-City in the Woods” had been selected for the November conference as well.  The panel will include someone from NPS, DC Parks & Recreation, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, and Washington Parks & People.

Carl Cole suggested that the group consider including someone from the business community on the panel.  He said that the business community was interested in green space and that a representative from the Board of trade, Committee of 100, or the Federal City Council would be a good addition.  Carl said that green is the most lucrative landmass of all the open space in the metro region.

Terry Carlstrom suggested that perhaps Carl Cole could be a part of this panel.  Steve Coleman noted that the City is contracting with Bill Morris of UVA to do a whitepaper on parks—or green assets.

Patrick Gregerson asked whether the conference would have poster sessions and suggested it would be good to highlight the work of the Anacostia River.

Regional Vision:John Parsons noted the interest of Patty Gallagher of the National Capital Planning Commission in parks, open space and recreation areas.  He said that 1967 was the last time an Open Space Plan was done for the region and that NCPC has offered to be the official planning forum to do that.  He also noted that DC is doing a Request for Proposals for a new park plan.  Parsons urged the group to look at the whole city to assess parks and needs, to identify what we have and what is missing.

In response to Parsons’ remarks Neil Albert indicated that the NCPC effort would enhance the DC effort. Sally Blumenthal said that NCPC could help with open space beyond NPS and DC lands.  Ted Pochter said that he will look at recreation services and that NCPC could help to erase the boundaries between different jurisdictions.

Destry Jarvis continued the discussion by indicating that the areas outside of DC are important because of the connecting areas or areas that draw from the region.  He suggested that NCPC’s focus would be on DC rather than the region. Carl Cole reaffirmed this point by adding that the broader business community works across boundaries.

John Parsons continued by saying that he wants to promote the regional effort with NCPC.  Patrick Gregerson added that he works with transportation agencies, DC, and MD National Parks & Planning on bicycle connections.

John Parsons urged the group to help by providing his office with comments on the Ft. Circle Parks Plan.  He said that he wants comments as soon as possible and that he would accept comments after the July 15 deadline.

NPS-DC Parks & Recreation Liaison: Carl Cole suggested to the group that there be a permanent liaison relationship between DC and NPS.  Sally Blumenthal indicated that NPS has this arrangement with States, for programs such as the Land and Water Conservation Fund. She suggested that we also need to look at the Land and Water Conservation Fund appropriation that DC gets and try to increase it.  Ted Pochter indicated that the proposed CARA legislation had suggested that more funds be given to DC.

Destry Jarvis noted that Tom Ross of NPS headquarters was doing analysis of the Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Act Program formula that is being used for cities.  Steve Coleman urged the group to look at other options for funding.  He said we need to use an interagency-private sector effort.

Carl Cole reminded the group that the perception of many is that DC parks are already funded.

Destry Jarvis suggested that we convene a meeting of all park directors to discuss this idea.  He also stressed the need to focus on park, open space and recreation areas on the ground that are real.

Watts Branch: Steve Coleman made some opening remarks about the effort to restore and revitalize watts Branch.  He stressed the importance of this NPS-owned stream valley park and the need to work one step at a time with a hand and glove partnership.  

Gayle Hazelwood said that National Capital Parks-East could help with a joint map and guide.  Gentry Davis indicated that graphic assistance might be available for such a product from Sheperdstown College in WV and pointed to the recent NPS-NCR Annual report as an example of that type of service.

2004 Conference: Glenn Eugster described plans underway to hold 2004 parks, open space, and recreation area conference.  

In response to Mr. Eugster’s remarks, Sally Blumenthal suggested that the forum be similar to the recent Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail Conference. Carl Cole urged the group to share expertise for horticultural services and provide advice and counseling services to communities as a way to develop relationships and share expertise.  He also noted discussions that DC was having with Casey trees.

Steve Coleman suggested that there be a joint needs assessment for all DC parks.  In response to Mr. Coleman’s comments Terry Carlstrom noted the “Business Plans” that NPS has developed for Central, C & O Canal and Harpers Ferry.  He noted that NPS-NCR has a needs assessment and that it is available from Ed Duffy. He also urged Ted Pochther to contact Jim Sherald of NPS’s Center for Urban Ecology for more information on needs.

DC Master Plan: Ted Pochter noted that a facility assessment is being done for DC’s parks.  It will include a demand survey and a recreation services delivery analysis.

Follow-up Actions:

  1. Steve Coleman offered to explore options for the group to share a List Server
  2. The next meeting is proposed to be in late September or early October.  The group agreed that we should use the meeting to visit an area and add other DC, NPS and private partners.  Glenn Eugster agreed to facilitate the meeting arrangements and suggestions for a meetign location.
  3. Glenn Eugster agreed to check on a proposed meeting that was to be held between DC, Washington Parks & people and Chris Jarvi and Brian O’Neill of NPS.
  4. Glenn Eugster agreed to arrange a work session for the Washington: A City in the Woods Panel Presentation as soon as NPS headquarters provides the team with more information for the November conference.
  5. Steve Coleman agreed to make a formal request to NPS for the NCR park needs assessment.
  6. Ted Pochter agreed to contact Jim Sherald of NPS to discuss further collaboration with Casey trees.
  7. Gayle Hazelwood agreed to organize a work session on the Watts branch effort.
  8. Sally Blumenthal agreed to work with John Parsons and report on the NCPC Board Retreat.
  9. All the participants agreed to seek and provide comments on the Ft. Circle Parks Plan.
  10. Leslie Shinn and Patrick Gregerson agreed to continue to work on GIS Mapping.
  11. Terry Carlstrom agreed to get back to DC with a person that will serve as the parks, open space and recreation area liaison.
  12. Glenn Eugster agreed to help convene a meeting to discuss the proposed 2004 parks, open space and recreation area conference.
  13. Leslie Shinn will send the group a DC Parks Master Plan Request for Proposal



NPS-DC Parks, Recreation and Open Space Roundtable Meeting Summary November 8, 2004

NPS-DC Parks, Recreation and Open Space Roundtable
Meeting Summary
November 8, 2004

DRAFT

Attendees

Sarah Boasberg (Sally), Green Spaces for DC
Kate Herrod, Community Greens
Gayle Hazelwood, NPS, National Capital Parks-East
Kevin Brandt, NPS, C&O Canal National Historical Park
Karen Cucurullo, NPS, National Mall & Memorial Parks
Joe DiBello, NPS-Northeast Region
Destry Jarvis, Washington Parks & People
Neil Stanley, DC Parks & Recreation
Drew Becher, DC Parks & Recreation
Lucy, Michael, DC Parks & Recreation
Pochter, Ted, DC Parks & Recreation
Tammy Stidham, NPS-NCR
Glenn Eugster, NPS-NCR
Joe Lawler, NPS-NCR
Terry Carlstrom, NPS-NCR
Don Briggs, NPS, Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail
Mary Rowse, citizen
Kathy Cox, Fort Dupont Ice Arena
Nanine Bilski, America the Beautiful Fund
Darwina Neal, NPS-NCR
Liz Guthrie, Green Spaces for DC
Dan Smith, Casey Trees Endowment Fund
Sally Blumenthal, NPS-NCR
John Parsons, NPS-NCR 
Gentry Davis, NPS-NCR
Adrienne Applewaithe-Coleman, NPS-Rock Creek Park
Leslie Schill, DC Parks & Recreation
Joe Cook, NPS-NCR
Maria Lurie, Department of Interior, Sollicitor's Office
Don Fishman, DC General Council
Susan Boyd, Concern, Inc.
Bill Line, NPS-NCR
Heather Deutch, DC Parks & Rerecreation
Joan Prioriton, GSA and DC Preservation League

I.  Welcome, Opening Remarks and Introductions

Terry Carlstrom and Neil Stanley welcomed the group and made opening remarks.  Neil described the new DPR organization and introduced the managers responsible for various activities.  Glenn Eugster and Ted Pochter, the liaisons for NPS and DC, provided brief comments on the purpose of the Roundtable.

II.  Old Business:

NCPC Parks & Open Space Plan:
John Parsons indicated that in FY 06 there is a plan to look at NPS and DC parks and recreation plans and maintenance.  John suggested that DC, NPS and NCPC should get together to discuss this effort.  He noted that it was further complicated by the GAO Report [which is looking at the recreation use of parklands in DC].  He noted that the DC Comprehensive Plan is on hold and that NCPC doesn’t have the budget to redo the plan.

Sally Boasberg asked about whether there will be funding to maintain lands that are transferred from NPS to DC?  She indicated that she was concerned about DC getting left with maintenance costs.

Drew Becher indicated that DC doesn’t have a goal for open space and they could take it [the plan] down to the neighborhood level.  He said there were no large guidelines in place for parks in the City.

Gentry Davis asked whether the effort will look at schools?  Drew indicated that they are open to other DC properties.

Sally Blumenthal suggested that the Office of Planning, and planning for acquisition, is key to this.

Destry Jervis asked whether DC’s determination has to wait until the NCPC Study?  Drew said that this needs to be done in partnership with NCPC.

Kate Herrod asked whether existing park use is being considered?

Trust for Public Lands City Parks Book

Ted Pochter said that he talked to Peter Harnick of TPL.  TPL will include DC and NPS parklands in the new book and that “bench-marking” is important to DC.

Meridian Hill Park Collaboration

Adrienne Applewaithe-Coleman reported on the discussions between NPS, DC and Washington Parks & People, about Meridian Hill Park.  She said that it was NPS’s understanding that Washington Parks & People were to prepare a proposal for ways to partner.  Destry Jervis indicated that a proposal is coming.


III. New Business

Kenilworth North

John Parsons described the Kenilworth North property and indicated that it had been used as a landfill/dump and in need of cleanup.  John said that the House and Senate proposed to lease the property, the acreage of which is to be determined, to DC. The legislation calls for the lease 90 days from the date the law was approved-- November 11, 2004.

John said that a map is being prepared for external use and that it includes the end of Watts Branch.  He noted that it was ridiculous how quickly the decision-making and legislation for this property moved.  Neil Stanley noted that he was delighted by the action and this was a new opportunity for DCPR.

John Parsons indicated that the project must move through [be reviewed] by NCPC, and the Mayor and City Council.  He was unsure how long that would take.

Gentry Davis asked about how law enforcement would be handled?  Drew Becher noted there might be an opportunity to use the Metro Police Department and the Urban Park Rangers.  Neil noted that DC would attempt to coordinate these two organizations more tightly.

Sherieer Place House: 106 Issues

Ted Pochter said that DC had hired a consultant to look at options for the park.  He said that one concept is to remove the house and open the park to the street to make it more accessible.  He noted that because it is under federal ownership it has to go through the 106 process of the Historic Preservation Act.  He said that an architectural assessment was being completed but that the 106 process, with the DC State Historic Preservation Office, hasn’t started their review.

Ted noted that the house was built in 1925 and that it is eligible as a National Historic register property.  He added that NPS acquired the property in 1958.

Mary Rowse asked whether or not a formal 106 letter has been sent?  Ted indicated that it has not been sent. Joan Prioriton added that the DC Preservation League sent a letter to NPS and DC requesting to be a partner in the 106 process.

Poplar Point Soccer Stadium Proposal
Sally Blumenthal noted that when news of the proposal to build a soccer stadium on Poplar Point appeared in the newspaper it was shock to NPS.  She added that it is not in the Anacostia GMP but that DC's Sports and Entertainment Commission and a private developer have approached NPS.  She said that NPS advised both parties that they don’t support this proposal and added that if there is community interest [in the stadium] there should be a study to identify alternatives with public input.  Sally added that the stadium proposal calls for a “Nissan Pavilion-type of operation”.

Joe Lawler said that decisions about Poplar Point should reflect the community planning process and should stay true to the decisions that have been made.  Terry Carlstrom added that the planning documents are already in place for this site and call for the elimination of NPS operation facilities.

Someone asked, who proposed this?  John Parsons indicated that a private developer has proposed it.  Drew Becher noted that the developer owns 3-4 stadiums across the country.

DC Parks & Recreation Urban Park Rangers
Drew Becher noted that DC was looking at what other cities are doing.  Gentry Davis replied by saying that it is important to define the mission of the rangers.  He noted that in the past the have been problems with DC rangers filtering into NPS areas.

Carl Cole noted that the ideas were excellent and that natural resources know no boundaries.  Drew asked if it was possible to have NPS do some natural resources training for the DC urban rangers?  Glenn Eugster agreed to discuss this request with Jim Sherald and report back to the District.

Gayle Hazelwood indicated that interpretive competencies and visitor services training should be added to this.  Drew said that there will be 11 fulltime rangers and that he hoped they would be ready for Memorial Day.  Terry Carlstrom suggested that the training might involve assistance from NCR superintendents.  Tammy Stidham suggested that NPS Intake training might be an appropriate model.  Drew said he wants to sit down with a core group. 

Ft. DuPont Ice Rink Expansion
Don Fishman described a proposal for the Ft. DuPont Ice Rink and said that DC wants NPS input before they go out [with an RFP for design and engineering services].  He noted that this was the only indoor ice rink in DC and that the Friends of Ft. Dupont requested NPS to expand the facility and they said they would raise money to do this.  DC’s role would be to support the project.

Gayle Hazelwood said that the proposal was going through an internal NPS review and that as soon as it is completed, and she hires her Deputy Superintendent, she’ll move on it.

Destry Jervis asked about the footprint of the proposed development.  Fishman indicated that it roughly doubles the size of what is there now.  Carl Cole added that Gayle, John Parsons and Sally Blumenthal were looking at the specifics of the proposal. He noted that the proposal calls for expansion of the facility into a natural resource area.

DC Recreation Summit
Gayle Hazelwood said that following the Wonderful Outdoor World Conference she spoke to Derrick Crandall about the idea of a youth summit modeled after the one done in Portland Oregon lead by Charles Jordan.  She asked the group is there interest in organizing a youth summit?

Neil Stanley and Terry Carlstrom said that they are supportive.

Gayle indicated that the effort needs to be as inclusive as possible.

Someone asked does it have to only be for youth?  What is the timeline?  Gayle responded that the desired audience is youth and that a late spring-early summer 05 would is the target date.

Drew Becher urged the group to stay away from the summer.  Neil Stanley responded by saying, count us in.  He added that DC is trying to expand how they view recreation and are working towards meeting the needs of a more diverse population.  In some situation now we have a golf course and swimming pool side-by-side and we don't communicate or provide access at all.

Nanine Bilski added that this type of approach is happening much more in other cities.  Someone else replied that this seems to have relevance to the GAO study on the use of recreation lands in DC.

Terry Carlstrom, with confirmation from Joe Lawler, said that NPS is willing to help.  

Community Greens
Kate Herrod briefed the group on the work of Community Greens.  She stressed that green space where people live creates a sense of community to help manage the neighborhood.  Kate noted that community greens work better than condominium associations because these areas encourage people to get to know leaders and they create stability in neighborhoods because of their amenity value.  She added that they are also a place for kids to play, they reduce the heat island effect, stormwater, and create bird habitat.

Kate mentioned that her group wants to create a demonstration project in tandem with a legislative effort.  Community Greens is working in Baltimore.  There the City has over 13,000 vacant houses and 14,000 vacant lots.  In Baltimore alleyways aren't assets and people have serious concerns about the use of the alleys for dumping, drugs and prostitution.

Her group went to the MD State Legislature for help and Baltimore now has the authority to gate, close and lease the alleys to a legal entity for $1 per year.  Community Greens is now working with the City, with the support of the Mayor's Office, to develop ordinance support.  Kate said this work might be a model for other cities and that she is talking with leaders in Alexandria and Arlington, VA about applying this approach.

Ted Pochter asked if Community Greens was working with privately owned parks and he noted that there was a 2-acre park in DC that might be appropriate for this approach.

Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail--Trail Route Designation

Don Briggs reported that in 1999 the DC Council passed a resolution for trails in the District.  He said he would be talking with DC DOT about a process to recognize a heritage trail network.  He also noted that this thinking was consistent with ideas that are described in the Ft. Circle Plan.  It was noted that copies of the Ft. Circle Plan are available from Sally Blumenthal or Patrick Gregerson of NPS.

Oxon Run Master Plan
Gayle Hazelwood reported that NPS is hoping to do a management plan for Oxon Cove.  They are in the process of hiring a consultant but noted that the US Fish and Wildlife Service did some concept planning for the area.

Gayle told the group that Oxon Cove was once a landfill area and the park has undergone considerable stress.  John Parsons added that it includes a unique Magnolia Bog and the property is a prime piece of real estate that DC and NPS should look at together. He noted that there is an opportunity to link campsites and develop open space here.

Trash and Litter Campaign: Drew Becher said that DC wants to undertake a clean up and is willing to coordinate a trash and litter campaign.

Green Roof Conference: Drew Becher provided the group with a handout regarding the May 4-6, 2005 Green Roof Conference in DC.

Oxon Run: Michael Lucy noted that DC was distributing mulch.  If anyone wants it please contact him.

Tree Removal and Recycling: Drew Becher mentioned that the District is talking to a small company to help with the removal and recycling of downed trees.  Gentry Davis asked whether the District would have a place to store downed trees?  Drew indicated that he should be able to report on this at the next meeting.

John Parsons added that the DC Department of Public Works is doing a study to look at the impact of the last ice storm.

Residential Open Space Requirements: Drew Becher reported that the District's Residential Open Space Requirement is being looked at.  He noted that interior spaces are being created and counted as open space now.  He said we need to look at this jointly.

Other Events: Glenn Eugster noted the following NPS-co-sponsored park workshops:
Nov. 10 Watts Branch
Nov. 16 Great Falls, VA

IV.  Next Meeting

The next meeting is February 2, 2005 from 10:00 am until 12 noon at the Hillcrest Recreation center at 32 Camden Street Direction? Washington, DC.  More information on the location and meeting agenda will be provided.








Follow-up to March 4, 2003 meeting with the District of Columbia and Washington Parks & People

DRAFT 
Follow-up to March 4, 2003 meeting with
the District of Columbia and Washington Parks & People 
April 21, 2003

Goals:

  • Improve efficiency and quality of management of our operations through interagency collaboration, cooperative projects, and joint ventures.
  • Improve quality of services to the residents/ visitors we serve.
  • Improve communication.
  • Demonstrate the seamless system approach to parks, open space and recreation areas through experimental sharing of personnel, programs, facilities, and public parklands through the city wherever proximity, similarity of function, or achieving efficiencies or economies of scale make sense.
  • Identifying and implementing opportunities around the city for the active engagement of public involvement in park operations and maintenance through cooperative agreements, public-private partnerships, public-private cost-sharing, community-based shared management, and operational partnerships between the two public agencies and community-based organizations such as Washington Parks & People.


  1. Use Watts Branch to advance the seamless system idea.
  1. Move forward to see if it is possible to erase boundary-lines.

  1. Present at the National Partnership Conference
  1. Submit a proposal for a panel on green infrastructure at the LA Conference.  Include DC, Washington Parks & People, NPS.  Consider Casey Trees, COG, and others.

3.  Secure Cultural Landscape Report copies for Steve Coleman and Neil Albert.

4.  Work with NPS-NCR to use GIS information to overlay DC and NPS parks to assess opportunities for collaboration.

  1. Meet to discuss Casey Trees inventory.


6.  Agree on ways to communicate 

NPS-DC Parks, Recreation and Open Space Roundtable Meeting Summary November 8, 2004

NPS-DC Parks, Recreation and Open Space Roundtable
Meeting Summary
November 8, 2004

DRAFT

Attendees

Sarah Boasberg (Sally), Green Spaces for DC
Kate Herrod, Community Greens
Gayle Hazelwood, NPS, National Capital Parks-East
Kevin Brandt, NPS, C&O Canal National Historical Park
Karen Cucurullo, NPS, National Mall & Memorial Parks
Joe DiBello, NPS-Northeast Region
Destry Jarvis, Washington Parks & People
Neil Stanley, DC Parks & Recreation
Drew Becher, DC Parks & Recreation
Lucy, Michael, DC Parks & Recreation
Pochter, Ted, DC Parks & Recreation
Tammy Stidham, NPS-NCR
Glenn Eugster, NPS-NCR
Joe Lawler, NPS-NCR
Terry Carlstrom, NPS-NCR
Don Briggs, NPS, Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail
Mary Rowse, citizen
Kathy Cox, Fort Dupont Ice Arena
Nanine Bilski, America the Beautiful Fund
Darwina Neal, NPS-NCR
Liz Guthrie, Green Spaces for DC
Dan Smith, Casey Trees Endowment Fund
Sally Blumenthal, NPS-NCR
John Parsons, NPS-NCR 
Gentry Davis, NPS-NCR
Adrienne Applewaithe-Coleman, NPS-Rock Creek Park
Leslie Schill, DC Parks & Recreation
Joe Cook, NPS-NCR
Maria Lurie, Department of Interior, Sollicitor's Office
Don Fishman, DC General Council
Susan Boyd, Concern, Inc.
Bill Line, NPS-NCR
Heather Deutch, DC Parks & Rerecreation
Joan Prioriton, GSA and DC Preservation League

I.  Welcome, Opening Remarks and Introductions

Terry Carlstrom and Neil Stanley welcomed the group and made opening remarks.  Neil described the new DPR organization and introduced the managers responsible for various activities.  Glenn Eugster and Ted Pochter, the liaisons for NPS and DC, provided brief comments on the purpose of the Roundtable.

II.  Old Business:

NCPC Parks & Open Space Plan:
John Parsons indicated that in FY 06 there is a plan to look at NPS and DC parks and recreation plans and maintenance.  John suggested that DC, NPS and NCPC should get together to discuss this effort.  He noted that it was further complicated by the GAO Report [which is looking at the recreation use of parklands in DC].  He noted that the DC Comprehensive Plan is on hold and that NCPC doesn’t have the budget to redo the plan.

Sally Boasberg asked about whether there will be funding to maintain lands that are transferred from NPS to DC?  She indicated that she was concerned about DC getting left with maintenance costs.

Drew Becher indicated that DC doesn’t have a goal for open space and they could take it [the plan] down to the neighborhood level.  He said there were no large guidelines in place for parks in the City.

Gentry Davis asked whether the effort will look at schools?  Drew indicated that they are open to other DC properties.

Sally Blumenthal suggested that the Office of Planning, and planning for acquisition, is key to this.

Destry Jervis asked whether DC’s determination has to wait until the NCPC Study?  Drew said that this needs to be done in partnership with NCPC.

Kate Herrod asked whether existing park use is being considered?

Trust for Public Lands City Parks Book

Ted Pochter said that he talked to Peter Harnick of TPL.  TPL will include DC and NPS parklands in the new book and that “bench-marking” is important to DC.

Meridian Hill Park Collaboration

Adrienne Applewaithe-Coleman reported on the discussions between NPS, DC and Washington Parks & People, about Meridian Hill Park.  She said that it was NPS’s understanding that Washington Parks & People were to prepare a proposal for ways to partner.  Destry Jervis indicated that a proposal is coming.


III. New Business

Kenilworth North

John Parsons described the Kenilworth North property and indicated that it had been used as a landfill/dump and in need of cleanup.  John said that the House and Senate proposed to lease the property, the acreage of which is to be determined, to DC. The legislation calls for the lease 90 days from the date the law was approved-- November 11, 2004.

John said that a map is being prepared for external use and that it includes the end of Watts Branch.  He noted that it was ridiculous how quickly the decision-making and legislation for this property moved.  Neil Stanley noted that he was delighted by the action and this was a new opportunity for DCPR.

John Parsons indicated that the project must move through [be reviewed] by NCPC, and the Mayor and City Council.  He was unsure how long that would take.

Gentry Davis asked about how law enforcement would be handled?  Drew Becher noted there might be an opportunity to use the Metro Police Department and the Urban Park Rangers.  Neil noted that DC would attempt to coordinate these two organizations more tightly.

Sherier Place House: 106 Issues

Ted Pochter said that DC had hired a consultant to look at options for the park.  He said that one concept is to remove the house and open the park to the street to make it more accessible.  He noted that because it is under federal ownership it has to go through the 106 process of the Historic Preservation Act.  He said that an architectural assessment was being completed but that the 106 process, with the DC State Historic Preservation Office, hasn’t started their review.

Ted noted that the house was built in 1925 and that it is eligible as a National Historic register property.  He added that NPS acquired the property in 1958.

Mary Rowse asked whether or not a formal 106 letter has been sent?  Ted indicated that it has not been sent. Joan Prioriton added that the DC Preservation League sent a letter to NPS and DC requesting to be a partner in the 106 process.

Poplar Point Soccer Stadium Proposal
Sally Blumenthal noted that when news of the proposal to build a soccer stadium on Poplar Point appeared in the newspaper it was shock to NPS.  She added that it is not in the Anacostia GMP but that DC's Sports and Entertainment Commission and a private developer have approached NPS.  She said that NPS advised both parties that they don’t support this proposal and added that if there is community interest [in the stadium] there should be a study to identify alternatives with public input.  Sally added that the stadium proposal calls for a “Nissan Pavilion-type of operation”.

Joe Lawler said that decisions about Poplar Point should reflect the community planning process and should stay true to the decisions that have been made.  Terry Carlstrom added that the planning documents are already in place for this site and call for the elimination of NPS operation facilities.

Someone asked, who proposed this?  John Parsons indicated that a private developer has proposed it.  Drew Becher noted that the developer owns 3-4 stadiums across the country.

DC Parks & Recreation Urban Park Rangers
Drew Becher noted that DC was looking at what other cities are doing.  Gentry Davis replied by saying that it is important to define the mission of the rangers.  He noted that in the past the have been problems with DC rangers filtering into NPS areas.

Carl Cole noted that the ideas were excellent and that natural resources know no boundaries.  Drew asked if it was possible to have NPS do some natural resources training for the DC urban rangers?  Glenn Eugster agreed to discuss this request with Jim Sherald and report back to the District.

Gayle Hazelwood indicated that interpretive competencies and visitor services training should be added to this.  Drew said that there will be 11 fulltime rangers and that he hoped they would be ready for Memorial Day.  Terry Carlstrom suggested that the training might involve assistance from NCR superintendents.  Tammy Stidham suggested that NPS Intake training might be an appropriate model.  Drew said he wants to sit down with a core group. 

Ft. DuPont Ice Rink Expansion
Don Fishman described a proposal for the Ft. DuPont Ice Rink and said that DC wants NPS input before they go out [with an RFP for design and engineering services].  He noted that this was the only indoor ice rink in DC and that the Friends of Ft. Dupont requested NPS to expand the facility and they said they would raise money to do this.  DC’s role would be to support the project.

Gayle Hazelwood said that the proposal was going through an internal NPS review and that as soon as it is completed, and she hires her Deputy Superintendent, she’ll move on it.

Destry Jervis asked about the footprint of the proposed development.  Fishman indicated that it roughly doubles the size of what is there now.  Carl Cole added that Gayle, John Parsons and Sally Blumenthal were looking at the specifics of the proposal. He noted that the proposal calls for expansion of the facility into a natural resource area.

DC Recreation Summit
Gayle Hazelwood said that following the Wonderful Outdoor World Conference she spoke to Derrick Crandall about the idea of a youth summit modeled after the one done in Portland Oregon lead by Charles Jordan.  She asked the group is there interest in organizing a youth summit?

Neil Stanley and Terry Carlstrom said that they are supportive.

Gayle indicated that the effort needs to be as inclusive as possible.

Someone asked does it have to only be for youth?  What is the timeline?  Gayle responded that the desired audience is youth and that a late spring-early summer 05 would is the target date.

Drew Becher urged the group to stay away from the summer.  Neil Stanley responded by saying, count us in.  He added that DC is trying to expand how they view recreation and are working towards meeting the needs of a more diverse population.  In some situation now we have a golf course and swimming pool side-by-side and we don't communicate or provide access at all.

Nanine Bilski added that this type of approach is happening much more in other cities.  Someone else replied that this seems to have relevance to the GAO study on the use of recreation lands in DC.

Terry Carlstrom, with confirmation from Joe Lawler, said that NPS is willing to help.  

Community Greens
Kate Herrod briefed the group on the work of Community Greens.  She stressed that green space where people live creates a sense of community to help manage the neighborhood.  Kate noted that community greens work better than condominium associations because these areas encourage people to get to know leaders and they create stability in neighborhoods because of their amenity value.  She added that they are also a place for kids to play, they reduce the heat island effect, stormwater, and create bird habitat.

Kate mentioned that her group wants to create a demonstration project in tandem with a legislative effort.  Community Greens is working in Baltimore.  There the City has over 13,000 vacant houses and 14,000 vacant lots.  In Baltimore alleyways aren't assets and people have serious concerns about the use of the alleys for dumping, drugs and prostitution.

Her group went to the MD State Legislature for help and Baltimore now has the authority to gate, close and lease the alleys to a legal entity for $1 per year.  Community Greens is now working with the City, with the support of the Mayor's Office, to develop ordinance support.  Kate said this work might be a model for other cities and that she is talking with leaders in Alexandria and Arlington, VA about applying this approach.

Ted Pochter asked if Community Greens was working with privately owned parks and he noted that there was a 2-acre park in DC that might be appropriate for this approach.

Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail--Trail Route Designation

Don Briggs reported that in 1999 the DC Council passed a resolution for trails in the District.  He said he would be talking with DC DOT about a process to recognize a heritage trail network.  He also noted that this thinking was consistent with ideas that are described in the Ft. Circle Plan.  It was noted that copies of the Ft. Circle Plan are available from Sally Blumenthal or Patrick Gregerson of NPS.

Oxon Run Master Plan
Gayle Hazelwood reported that NPS is hoping to do a management plan for Oxon Cove.  They are in the process of hiring a consultant but noted that the US Fish and Wildlife Service did some concept planning for the area.

Gayle told the group that Oxon Cove was once a landfill area and the park has undergone considerable stress.  John Parsons added that it includes a unique Magnolia Bog and the property is a prime piece of real estate that DC and NPS should look at together. He noted that there is an opportunity to link campsites and develop open space here.

Trash and Litter Campaign: Drew Becher said that DC wants to undertake a clean up and is willing to coordinate a trash and litter campaign.

Green Roof Conference: Drew Becher provided the group with a handout regarding the May 4-6, 2005 Green Roof Conference in DC.

Oxon Run: Michael Lucy noted that DC was distributing mulch.  If anyone wants it please contact him.

Tree Removal and Recycling: Drew Becher mentioned that the District is talking to a small company to help with the removal and recycling of downed trees.  Gentry Davis asked whether the District would have a place to store downed trees?  Drew indicated that he should be able to report on this at the next meeting.

John Parsons added that the DC Department of Public Works is doing a study to look at the impact of the last ice storm.

Residential Open Space Requirements: Drew Becher reported that the District's Residential Open Space Requirement is being looked at.  He noted that interior spaces are being created and counted as open space now.  He said we need to look at this jointly.

Other Events: Glenn Eugster noted the following NPS-co-sponsored park workshops:
  • Nov. 10 Watts Branch
  • Nov. 16 Great Falls, VA

IV.  Next Meeting

Note:  The next meeting, which was scheduled for February 2, 2005, has been postponeed at the request of the District and will be rescheduled as soon as possible.  More information on the location and meeting agenda will be provided.








DC-NPS Parks, Open Space & Recreation Areas Roundtable Re-visiting the idea: Summary of Responses October 5, 2005

DC-NPS Parks, Open Space & Recreation Areas Roundtable
Re-visiting the idea: Summary of Responses
October 5, 2005
Glenn Eugster


DC and NPS leaders were asked to take a minute and indicate how they feel about the idea of continuing the quarterly DC-NPS Parks, Open Space and Recreation Areas Roundtable Meetings.  The responses follow.

DC Parks & Recreation Department

  • Ms. Flowers, the Director, is interested in continuing NPS-DPR 
Roundtable discussions and she and Leslie Schill, Ted Pochter’s replacement as liaison to NPS for the Roundtable, would like to discuss some preliminary agenda items and themes.


NPS National Capital Region

  • Three regional office managers responded.

  • One “ thinks it's an idea (continuing meetings) we should pursue”, but adds,
“I'm a little antsy about the public participation side, however, because they become forums for special interests, i.e. Baltimore house, dog runs, etc.”

  • One said, “I think regular meetings with DC Officials can only be 
mutually beneficial, and they are in keeping with how the Director wants us to operate.”

  • One said that they support the idea of the meetings but feel that they should be for NPS 
and DC only.


DC NPS Park Superintendents

  • Three superintendents responded.

  • One said, “I don't have the sense that the stated goals were ever
achieved.  I don't think the meetings were productive.”

  • One said, “I think they are still very useful and much needed.”

  • One said, “ Since I have not attended the meetings, I do not know 
how productive they have been or what results have emerged.  As a matter of good sense, it would seem important to continue these meetings in some form.  Perhaps twice a year instead of quarterly, if others feel the meetings are coming too often.”