Sunday, March 16, 2014

Green Infrastructure Forum -- March 17-18, 1999 Washington, D.C.


SUMMARY
Green Infrastructure Forum  -- March 17-18, 1999 
Washington, D.C.
     
For two days, a group of about 50 advocates of  green 
infrastructure approaches discussed experiences and shared 
practical tools.  Participants included: landscape architects, 
foresters, planners, scientists, community coordinators, 
ecologists, economists, and more.  They searched for key messages 
to share with colleagues at the upcoming Town Meeting for a 
Sustainable America.   The following is a very brief summary of 
what took place.
     
Green Infrastructure:  A system of environmental and natural 
resource land and water areas within a place-based unit that are 
incorporated into a broader plan or policy for land use 
management.
     
Meeting Objectives - Ruth McWilliams, USDA  and Glenn Eugster, 
EPA:  1) Expand understanding of green infrastructure, and its 
many facets; 2) Develop key components for learning session at 
the National Town Meeting; and 3) Explore feasibility for 
establishing a network to continue green infrastructure effort.
     
Importance of Workshop - Adela Backiel. USDA Director of 
Sustainable Development and Small Farms:  The upcoming National 
Town Meeting for a Sustainable America, scheduled for May 2-5, 
provides a great opportunity to further the discussion and 
understanding of green infrastructure.   This workshop begins the 
groundwork for that town meeting.  We will begin to create a 
common understanding and language of green infrastructure.
     
Green Infrastructure at the Metropolitan Level - Beth Benson, 
Toronto Waterfront Regeneration Trust:  Green infrastructure is a 
sustainable development concept that cross boundaries, builds 
partnerships, encourages commitments, and takes responsibility.  
The four functions of green infrastructure are enhancing urban 
design, enhancing recreation opportunities, restoring natural 
habitat, and improving environmental quality.   For success, we 
need: certainty (rules, laws, timeframes . . .),  affordability, 
and consensus.
     
Green Infrastructure: A Holistic View from Los Angeles --  Andy 
Lipkis, Tree People: Trees must move from an amenity aspect to a 
core value of infrastructure. The Los Angeles area has not been 
viewed as a watershed, only as a storm water drain.  We must catch 
and utilize the rain that falls within LA.  Tree People created a 
GIS-based model that documents economic benefits of tree planting 
in urban areas.  They have initiated an effort to reduce asphalt 
paving and increase strategic tree planting at all public schools 
- results are reduced construction costs and building cooling 
expenses.
     
What is happening to the Green?  Gary Moll, American Forests:  
Using GIS tools to provide a regional vision, American Forests 
has developed images that show the change in Chesapeake Bay area 
tree cover since 1973.  Dramatic declines in tree cover are 
evident along major transportation corridors and extend out into 
previously rural area.  The GIS-based images can be linked to 
American Forests' City Green software tool, which enables 
inventory and analysis municipal tree planting and maintenance.
     
Land Trusts and Land Development --  Randall Arendt, Natural Land 
Trust:   Open space is not easily protected in traditional 
suburban development.   Efforts to protect and conserve open 
space can be integrated into developments where individual lot 
sizes are reduced to protect larger open areas.   Open space 
within these developments must then be protected by permanent 
easements.  
     
Efforts at the State Level - Florida  --  Mark Benedict, The 
Conservation Fund:  Florida took a strategic state-wide look at 
greenways.  The effort identified the natural resources needs, 
the human needs, and environmental and economic factors.  Florida 
calls their greenways "a green network" with existing 
conservation lands as the "hubs."  We learned that strong State 
agency and non-government organization leadership was essential, 
as were data base and modeling skills. 
     
Efforts at the State Level - Pennsylvania --  Larry Williamson, 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania:  In the past, the PA Department of 
Recreation and Conservation primarily gave grants for ball fields, 
swimming pools, and playgrounds.  The Nature Conservancy proposed 
something different in the early 1990's and we began funding 
easements for natural resource preservation.   The Governor's 
executive order to create a Greenway Commission created more 
interest in conservation easements.  We now provide grants to 
counties to work with conservancies to identify significant 
natural areas.    Larry's Tip -- when working on a proposal, 
include the local library as a partner, they have strong, active 
networks.
     
Elevating our Perspective About Green Infrastructure --  Anne 
Whiston Spirn, University of Pennsylvania:  We often lose track 
of what we have done in the past.  The Boston Reservation System 
was a coordinated construction of waterways, railways, roads, and 
parkland.  Once the vegetation was mature, people forgot the 
construction and viewed the area as a work of nature. Many 
low-lying land  areas, once filled, lose their surface 
characteristics.  However, in many cases water still flows below 
the surface.   Years later, we see the evidence of deteriorated 
buildings and neighborhoods.   We must institutionalize the 
valuable lessons of past actions. 
     
Current Facets of Green Infrastructure -  Group Discussion --  
Terry Tipple, Pinchot Institute (Facilitator)  Comments from 
participants:
     
        Working landscapes (ag & forest land) were a critical 
part of the Florida effort
        Talk to people "outside the box" - need new approaches 
        What is the community?  Single municipality, multiple 
counties, and regional?  Urban/Rural?
        Voluntary versus regulatory approaches - strong concerns 
for private property rights 
        Green infrastructure needs a strong educational component 
        How can we make real for City/County managers?
        We learn by doing - use a strong project approach
        Must consider the time dimension - processes take time, 
consider natural time cycles
     
Conceptually Mapping Green Infrastructure - Group Exercise - Fred 
Deneke, Forest Service (Facilitator)  The mapping exercise 
revealed the following core values and connecting streams:
     
        Core Values:  trust, scale, spirituality, 
interconnections, equity, diversity, change, and ethics
     
        Connecting Streams:  land and landscapes, growth and 
change, integrated ecosystem
management, policy, design, stakeholders, markets, natural 
capitol, social capitol, and
multifunctionalism   
     
Tools to Share at the Town Meeting Learning Session - Terry 
Tipple:  
     
        Give access to a network
        Provide a list of the best web sites 
        Publication on the benefits of trees
        A set of presentation slides describing green 
infrastructure
     
        *** Glenn: You have the flip charts on tools.  Others?
     
Forum Summary and Closeout - Ruth McWilliams and Glenn Eugster:  
     
        ***  I did not capture anything on your closeout  [[ 
other than some next steps to prepare for the learning session.  
Ruth/Glenn do you want to add a couple statements?
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
Notes from 3/19 Follow-up Green Infrastructure Work Session
     
Proposed Learning Session Agenda for Town Meeting  (90 minutes) 
Proposed Title -- Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and 
Communities
     
Power Point Presentation on Images of Green Infrastructure (5 
Minutes) - Janice McDougle
           (Introduce some images that will be used in later 
presentations  -- commit to producing a 
   tool kit in CD-ROM format)
     
Bridge from Intro to Case Studies (15 minutes) - Glenn Eugster
          (What is GI?  Benefits of GI.  Why we/you should be 
involved? Personal Commitments.)
     
Case Studies  -- all reference social, economic, and 
environmental facets (60 minutes)
     
        Los Angeles    --  Andy Lipkis (NGO)
     
        Lake Elmo  --  Bob Engstrom (Developer)
     
        GOCO & Routt County  -- Nancy Stahoviak (Local Government 
Official)
     
     
Tools to Take Home (10 minutes) --  Randall Arendt (Practitioner)
          (8 minute summary of tools for practitioners & 2 minute 
close)
     
     
Green Infrastructure Forum Follow-up Items (from 3/19 meeting)
     
        Prepare flyers on GI Learning Session for distribution at 
Town Meeting exhibit booths 
        (flyers would also describe other complimentary learning 
session - GI itinerary)
     
        Arrange for tables at Learning session for sharing 
tools/information brought by participants
     
        Prepare "10 page" handout on GI learning session 
(overview of GI, List of tools, 
web sites, references,  summaries of case studies, integrated 
tools, networks, ask 
current network for tools)  -- Glenn to head collection effort, 
Ruth & Glenn to finalize
     
Capture story of GI Forum and use to promote Town Meeting  (3 to 
4 page summary) - John
Nordin to prepare draft.
     
Pursue idea of onsite artist at Learning Session to create visual 
image of GI
     
Pursue commitments for follow-up training
     
     
Other Possible Case Studies:
     
        Mountains to Sound Greenway
        West Philly
        Natural Lands
        MD Green Infrastructure
        Chicago Wildlands
        Chesapeake Bay
        Portland
        Woodlands (TX)
        Florida Greenways
        Metro Greenways
        Windcrest/Sandy Spring (MD)
     

No comments:

Post a Comment